Matt RobsonWell, he wasn’t telling Americans it was their moral and ethical obligation to listen to them for religious reasons (only secular liberal humanist ones. Just a secularist co-opting some religious people on his own crusade. Isn’t the phrase - ‘Strange Bedfellows’? No one fears the Oprah-backed Depak Chopra type sentimentality or ‘religiosity’ as much as an actual religion. Why can the cult of Che, and Lenin cherish commie terrorists, whereas right-wingers can’t cite fascist activements without being morally evil? It goes all the way up the line. Those who have communist leanings are ‘confused’, and ‘rebellious free-thinkers’. Those who have fascist authoritarian leanings have mental disorders, and are evil.
http://www.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=doc&id=18416
2 seconds ago · Delete
Matt RobsonTo a secularist like Obama, religion is nothing but an excuse to be used to advance a liberal agenda. He doesn’t see his political stance as a chance to advance the covenant with Christ as some would say a devout president would. The issue is that we can all understand Obama’s goals. But, those who are not religious have trouble understanding someone who actually saw their statesmanship in a covenantal sense that went beyond the united states, and dealt with historical providence. The religion of the left consists of the ethical prerogatives of security and justice. Adapted to cosmopolitan centers without kinship and in-group value. The religion of the right incorporates 3 more prerogatives - Loyalty, Authority, Purity. So, the right’s morality is more encompassing and far-reaching into individuals choices. Adapted to traditional, pastoral, aspirations. Essentially, how to run an family,house, clan or aristoracy for dummies. The liberal religion represents the discontents of the city.
